Condor H55 HD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemCondor H55 HD  (all builds)
Motherboardcondor H55 HD
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '17 at 12:30
Run Duration88 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 540-$60
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Memory 73.1
1-Core 75
2-Core 129
56% 92.3 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 195
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
1.95% Terrible
Lighting 2.33
Reflection 2.65
Parallax 1.84
2% 2.28 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.13
Splatting 2.39
2% 2.54 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.95%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$35
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 90.9
Write 97
Mixed 31.2
53% 73 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.27
74% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
0, 0 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
28.6% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 11.4
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback