Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemSamsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B
Memory1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121102
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateSep 16 '17 at 11:34
Run Duration333 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 82
1-Core 57.5
2-Core 80.4
50% 73.3 Pts
4-Core 89.8
8-Core 106
13% 97.8 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0B6) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
1.37% Terrible
Lighting 1.57
Reflection 2.42
Parallax 1.03
1% 1.67 fps
MRender 2.24
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 2.52
2% 1.84 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.37%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 040H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.8% Below average
Read 259
Write 177
Mixed 216
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 5.09
51% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 2.92
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 7.58
20% 38.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 72%
WD Elements 25A3 5TB
2.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 30
Write 25.1
Mixed 27.1
35% 27.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.29
95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 66%
TOSHIBA MK1652GSX 160GB
53GB free, PID 1900
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 27.6
Write 25.9
Mixed 26.5
34% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.22
47% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 18%
Multiple Card Reader 2GB
2GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
5.49% Terrible
Read 17.4
Write 10
Mixed 12.4
16% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.09
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.02
12% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.49%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AD73I1C1674EV Kingston 9905594-005.A00LF 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.7% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.3
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 10.5
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B Builds (Compare 292 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $228
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback