Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	9.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	17.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z87-D3HP
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130417
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 16 '17 at 10:37
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670-$52 49,019 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 89.9 1-Core 106 2-Core 214 78% 136 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 347 47% 349 Pts	64-Core 313 19% 313 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 54,392 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Asus(1043 83BE) 1GB CLim: 910 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.53 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	9.9% Terrible	Lighting 11.1 Reflection 13.1 Parallax 9.34 9% 11.2 fps	MRender 15.4 Gravity 11.5 Splatting 15.1 12% 14 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.9% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS128GSSD360S 128GB 775 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 116GB free Firmware: 20151027 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 24 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 467 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 178 (A2) Unknown 100 100 1 (A3) Unknown 100 100 12 (A4) Unknown 100 100 1730 (A5) Unknown 100 100 1 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 6 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 301 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1807 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1286 (F5) Unknown 100 100 2465	59.8% Above average	Read 486 Write 200 Mixed 280 71% 322 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 93.6 4K Mixed 3.62 85% 39.1 MB/s	DQ Read 26.1 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 23.5 44% 82.7 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 73%
Intel X25-M 40GB 1,808 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2CV102HB Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3294 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2070 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 76 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 315021 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 65535 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 92 92 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0	17.8% Very poor	Read 164 Write 41.5 Mixed 28.5 17% 77.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.14 4K Write 14.6 4K Mixed 4.74 17% 7.16 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 40.7 DQ Mixed 1.17 21% 52.4 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 36%
Seagate ST3200827AS 200GB-$128 2,755 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 43GB free Firmware: 3.AAH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 107 97 150270030 (03) Spinup time 92 89 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5899 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 352997193 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 13590 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3098 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 2657 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 52 36 823394352 (C2) HDA temperature 48 64 51539607600 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 52 48 121020600 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	23.7% Poor	Read 41.2 Write 41.1 Mixed 40.8 31% 41 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.22 4K Mixed 0.39 89% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 36%
Samsung HD252KJ 250GB 1,184 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 27GB free Firmware: CM100-12 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 5568 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6474 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 10981 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2215 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 1341465 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 69 (BE) vendor-specific 59 46 41 (C2) HDA temperature 112 70 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 1341465 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 23	34.1% Below average	Read 56.5 Write 62.1 Mixed 63.2 46% 60.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.36 82% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 27,024 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	53% Above average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 16.7 52% 18 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 17 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 67.3 59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z87-D3HP-CF Builds (Compare 809 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	184x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	158x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	133x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	72x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	52x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	42x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	31x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	25x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	22x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	28x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	21x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $215

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16