| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asrock AB350 Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170713 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 16 '17 at 10:25 |
| Run Duration | 82 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
78.9%
Very good
|
80% 143 Pts
|
59% 440 Pts
|
27% 431 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
XFX(1682 956D) 2GB
CLim: 1309 MHz, MLim: 1900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.8.2
|
22.8%
Poor
|
21% 30.8 fps
|
25% 30.5 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
98%
Outstanding
|
123% 164 MB/s
|
118% 1.24 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2934 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
|
110%
Outstanding
|
116% 40.5 GB/s
|
91% 31.8 GB/s
|
52% 77.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical AB350 Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,979 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock AB350 Pro4 - $121
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 461x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 223x |
| Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples | 131x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 201x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 166x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 114x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $490 |