Hp-pavilion WC873AA-ABU p6300uk

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-pavilion WC873AA-ABU p6300uk  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON Narra6
Memory0.4 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100107
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 14 '17 at 18:48
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 215-$29
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 68.6
1-Core 37.2
2-Core 52.2
37% 52.7 Pts
4-Core 48
8-Core 58.1
7% 53 Pts
64-Core 68.9
4% 68.9 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220
MSI(1462 2021) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.16.11.9107
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.54% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 4.38
Parallax 1.72
3% 3.1 fps
MRender 3.71
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.78
2% 3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.54%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.0
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 101
Write 90.9
Mixed 104
75% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 0.55
4K Mixed 0.24
55% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
22.4% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 8.2
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.8
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback