Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	65.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170908
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '17 at 18:04
Run Duration	253 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	78.3% Very good	Memory 72.1 1-Core 118 2-Core 226 76% 139 Pts	4-Core 453 8-Core 829 77% 641 Pts	64-Core 1,242 77% 1,242 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-X-$781 8,241 User benchmarks, average bench 59% AMD(1002 0B36) CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.9.1 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Lighting 83.5 Reflection 57.6 Parallax 113 68% 84.6 fps	MRender 58 Gravity 90.2 Splatting 75.1 61% 74.4 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 65%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 200GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	201% Outstanding	Read 2,105 Write 1,109 Mixed 1,118 318% 1,444 MB/s	4K Read 49.5 4K Write 90.8 4K Mixed 22.2 152% 54.2 MB/s	DQ Read 49.6 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 21.4 42% 80.7 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 201% Great: 236%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 161GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6486 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3111 (B1) Unknown 94 94 62 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 55 25 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 2 (EB) Unknown 99 99 988 (F1) Unknown 99 99 39152446080	80.4% Excellent	Read 506 Write 278 Mixed 356 84% 380 MB/s	4K Read 40 4K Write 59.7 4K Mixed 19.6 117% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 232 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 72.4 90% 160 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 119651272 (03) Spinup time 94 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5138 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 76 60 4338957181 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7518 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2752 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 5 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 77 57 51926663191 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 722 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 81 81 39570 (C2) HDA temperature 23 43 -140737488355305 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -6399501267541 (F1) Unknown 100 253 32936658348 (F2) Unknown 100 253 51434648743	103% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 181 Mixed 166 132% 175 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 1.59 4K Mixed 0.32 99% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 113%
Toshiba MK3265GSX 320GB-$91 6,085 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 298GB free Firmware: GJ002D Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1176 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 523474 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 7962 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 251 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 683 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 56575 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 231928889366 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 41260835 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 104157543 (F0) Head flying hours 94 94 154539 (F1) Unknown 100 100 7627665859 (F2) Unknown 100 100 13425054574 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	47.1% Average	Read 79.9 Write 84 Mixed 79.5 61% 81.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.52 4K Mixed 0.25 75% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 48%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 298GB free Firmware: 3.ADG Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 93 96731770 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10673 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 63 60 962690200028 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 18984 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8799 (BB) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 53 471072796 (C2) HDA temperature 28 47 51539607580 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 82 49 41329029 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	33.2% Below average	Read 78.2 Write 37.2 Mixed 71.9 47% 62.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.41 98% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 43%
Samsung HM321HI 320GB-$90 12,451 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 298GB free Firmware: 2AJ10002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 3 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 89 85 3411 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 9086 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5372 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 96 96 4185 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4600 (B5) Unknown 100 100 4103881 (BF) G-sense error rate 99 99 11892 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 59 180388954134 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 416 (DF) Load/unload retry count 96 96 4185 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 113134	54.1% Above average	Read 94.6 Write 94.1 Mixed 90.7 70% 93.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.25 65% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40 653,654 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.4% Very good	MC Read 30.2 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 26.6 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 28.3 SC Mixed 22.8 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 96.6 41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $1,042

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)