PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 71.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock H61M-DG3/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20131118 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 14 '17 at 12:17 |
Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
|
71.7%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
71.9%
Very good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
62.6%
Good
|
||||
Samsung HD250HJ 250GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FH100-05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
44.1%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
50.9%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $69Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 21x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 18x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 11x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 21x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 9x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $118 |