Asus X555LN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus X555LN (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X555LN
Memory	3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140814
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '17 at 12:08
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	3%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4510U 63,054 User benchmarks, average bench 47% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Memory 88.9 1-Core 90 2-Core 148 67% 109 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 216 28% 214 Pts	64-Core 220 14% 220 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 840M 20,978 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Asus(1043 16CD) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8541 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Lighting 14.4 Reflection 10.9 Parallax 11.7 12% 12.3 fps	MRender 7 Gravity 14.4 Splatting 9.35 8% 10.2 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9831 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1695 (B1) Unknown 96 96 78 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 56 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 28 (F1) Unknown 99 99 25346815682
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 124GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 187 180 1650 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5206 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 9692 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2143 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 153 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 308 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 153 153 143387 (C2) HDA temperature 115 99 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	46.1% Average	Read 76.7 Write 83.8 Mixed 83 61% 81.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.26 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.18 56% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 62%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 4,068 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 64GB free, PID a006 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	Read 43.2 Write 43 Mixed 36.8 52% 41 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.24 58% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB 1,993 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	MC Read 18 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 16.7 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 16.3 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 68.6 58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X555LN Builds (Compare 467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X555LN

CPU
Core i5-4210UIntelBench 41%, 82,966 samples	272x
Core i7-4510UIntelBench 47%, 63,054 samples	163x
Core i3-4030UIntelBench 45%, 24,177 samples	17x

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	337x
GeForce 840MNvidiaBench 9%, 20,978 samples	129x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	1x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	18x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $31Bench 101%, 14,082 samples	12x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GBSamsungBench 50%, 1,993 samples	108x
MT41K512M8RH-125:E Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GBMicronBench 49%, 1,126 samples	56x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	39x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16