Asus P5Q-E

Performance Results

Gaming 26%
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation 24%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics30.7% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus P5Q-E  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090406
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 14 '17 at 11:58
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Xeon X5450-$299
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
39% Below average
SC Int 72.7
SC Float 42.6
SC Mixed 53.5
45% 56.3 Pts
QC Int 272
QC Float 160
QC Mixed 203
48% 211 Pts
MC Int 282
MC Float 162
MC Mixed 208
33% 218 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$104
CLim: 1236 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.9.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Lighting 87.2
Reflection 83.6
Parallax 108
29% 93 fps
MRender 65.2
Gravity 80.9
Splatting 79.8
32% 75.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 31%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$48
72GB free
Firmware: 0C3K87RA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.8% Below average
Read 208
Write 105
Mixed 56.5
27% 123 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 23.5
4K Mixed 7.99
58% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 29
DQ Write 40.2
DQ Mixed 9.46
14% 26.2 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 63%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
653GB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 90.6
Write 178
Mixed 74.6
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 5.24
4K Mixed 0.55
185% 2.14 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 105%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$67
251GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 72.5
Write 55.3
Mixed 66
49% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 0.79
4K Mixed 0.28
58% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6
18% 6.3 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 45%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P5Q-E Builds (Compare 776 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 16%
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation 24%

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $290
The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $172Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $280Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $139
Intel Core i7-7700K $285AMD RX 480 $300Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $180SanDisk Extreme 64GB $35
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $961SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback