Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3450 6,637 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	Memory 42.2 1-Core 43.6 2-Core 85.4 34% 57.1 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 171 23% 171 Pts	64-Core 169 10% 169 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4678 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.06% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 3.23 Parallax 2.03 2% 2.55 fps	MRender 2.71 Gravity 1.43 Splatting 3.78 2% 2.64 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.06% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk DF4128 125GB 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.1 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.9% Poor	Read 261 Write 103 Mixed 151 38% 171 MB/s	4K Read 4.66 4K Write 9.34 4K Mixed 3.2 16% 5.73 MB/s	DQ Read 6.26 DQ Write 14.6 DQ Mixed 2.35 4% 7.72 MB/s

Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 64GB-$13 1,615 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 49GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Read 110 Write 55.6 Mixed 38.3 74% 67.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.42 4K Write 0.001 4K Mixed 0.45 24% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x1.5GB 1,884 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 10.2 31% 11 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.7 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 192 21% 192 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16