User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Systemempty empty
MotherboardTYAN S7050
Memory56 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140701
Uptime7.3 Days
Run DateSep 14 '17 at 09:19
Run Duration55 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
67.7% Good
SC Int 70.3
SC Float 72
SC Mixed 71.7
57% 71.3 Pts
QC Int 284
QC Float 290
QC Mixed 288
65% 287 Pts
MC Int 1273
MC Float 1,300
MC Mixed 1,284
193% 1,285 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 84%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$67
677GB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 153
Mixed 99.5
106% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.24
86% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK M393B1K70DH0-CK M393B1K70DH0-CK M393B1K70DH0-CK M393B1K70DH0-CK M393B1K70DH0-YK M393B1K70DH0-CK M393B1K70DH0-CK 64GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82% Excellent
MC Read 43
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 31.4
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $325Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $295AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $119
Intel Core i5-7600K $210Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $265Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $711SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $152SanDisk Extreme 32GB $18
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $57HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $144SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback