To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 17%
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 22%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 7 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory0.1 GB free of 1 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120827
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 14 '17 at 08:52
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Pentium E5300-$52
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
22% Poor
SC Int 62.9
SC Float 37.2
SC Mixed 46.5
39% 48.9 Pts
QC Int 125
QC Float 73.9
QC Mixed 88.3
22% 95.7 Pts
MC Int 126
MC Float 72.3
MC Mixed 92.4
15% 96.7 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22%
Great: 23%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel G41 Express Chipset
Intel(8086 2E32) 271MB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.51% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 1.7
0% 1.5 fps
MRender 0.6
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 1.4
0% 1.2 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.51%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST340014AS 40GB-$30
13GB free
Firmware: 3.00 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 39
Write 39.3
Mixed 38.3
29% 38.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.87
4K Mixed 0.25
52% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 4 slots used
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
11.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 1.6
10% 3.63 GB/s
SC Read 0.1
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 0
4% 1.37 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 30%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 2,480 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $100
The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $335Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $139
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $189AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $140
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $198SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback