User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 24%
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
CPU throttled at 55% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
MotherboardNotebook W54_55_94_95_97AU,AUQ
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151002
Uptime6.7 Days
Run DateSep 14 '17 at 07:50
Run Duration102 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 55%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i3-5005U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
SC Int 32.4
SC Float 35.9
SC Mixed 34.1
27% 34.1 Pts
QC Int 81.3
QC Float 92.4
QC Mixed 90.1
20% 87.9 Pts
MC Int 83.6
MC Float 94.3
MC Mixed 88.1
13% 88.7 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Clevo(1558 5554) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
2.23% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 6.8
2% 6.1 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 9
3% 6.57 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.23%
Great: 7%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$67
171GB free
Firmware: Z32070RL
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 456
Write 328
Mixed 400
88% 395 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 18.5
4K Mixed 4.47
32% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 12.3
DQ Write 41
DQ Mixed 4.72
10% 19.3 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Team Team-Elite-1333 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
24.9% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 7.4
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 30%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $325Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $175Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $285Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $124
Intel Core i5-8600K $239AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $155
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $178SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $951SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $45HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback