Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6100-$68 44,863 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	Memory 79.4 1-Core 58.6 2-Core 122 54% 86.7 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 263 30% 233 Pts	64-Core 257 16% 257 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB 13,178 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 867GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP4OA41A Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Read 118 Write 131 Mixed 137 97% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.23 86% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 76%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 6,865 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 11GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	5.88% Terrible	Read 27.8 Write 3.96 Mixed 5.83 11% 12.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.98 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 16% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.88% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 43,127 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.8% Average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 17.4 50% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 13.4 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 81.7 49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 63%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 7450AMDBench 2%, 10,238 samples	3x

SSD
AGILITY3 60GBOCZBench 42%, 14,293 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	1x
M378B5173EB0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 54%, 453 samples	1x
8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 6GBMicronBench 34%, 23 samples	1x

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $68

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16