Asrock X99X Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99X Killer  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160701
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 14 '17 at 00:36
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 192
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 726
66% 554 Pts
64-Core 1,030
64% 1,030 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.6% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 155
Parallax 148
95% 140 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 135
Splatting 114
100% 123 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 400
Mixed 339
93% 418 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 44.6
163% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 77.2
93% 162 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 104%
Great: 134%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
906GB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 124
Write 153
Mixed 119
99% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 5.16
4K Mixed 0.64
186% 2.09 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63
474GB free
Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 154
Write 159
Mixed 151
117% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.38
109% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 113%
General USB Flash Disk 129GB
88GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 52.9
Write 35.2
Mixed 24.9
44% 37.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.63
4K Write 0.52
4K Mixed 0.48
51% 1.88 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 18%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.7% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 23.3
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 21.5
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99X Killer Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $923
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback