User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
SystemeMachines eME732Z
MotherboardeMachines HM55_CP
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110317
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '17 at 23:15
Run Duration104 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Pentium P6200
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
24.3% Poor
SC Int 51
SC Float 52.4
SC Mixed 51.4
41% 51.6 Pts
QC Int 97.7
QC Float 103
QC Mixed 97.3
22% 99.4 Pts
MC Int 100
MC Float 103
MC Mixed 104
15% 102 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 25%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Acer(1025 0498) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.01% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 3
Parallax 2.7
1% 2.77 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.8
1% 2.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.01%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$26
168GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 5400 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 77.9
Write 67.1
Mixed 64.7
52% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.12
54% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 4GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
23.2% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 8.9
22% 7.8 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 24%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $288Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $270AMD RX 480 $240Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $110
Intel Core i5-7600K $200Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $148
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $189SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $55Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $195SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback