Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics35.7% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170901
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 13 '17 at 21:37
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$285
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
SC Int 93.8
SC Float 98.7
SC Mixed 96.3
77% 96.3 Pts
QC Int 370
QC Float 394
QC Mixed 382
86% 382 Pts
MC Int 1,050
MC Float 1069
MC Mixed 1,071
159% 1,063 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
PwrHis(1787 3000) 3GB
CLim: 930 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.9.1
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
35.7% Below average
Lighting 107
Reflection 68.6
Parallax 112
34% 95.9 fps
MRender 59.2
Gravity 115
Splatting 84.1
37% 86.2 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 45%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba A100 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: SBFA10.1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 517
Write 93.7
Mixed 123
52% 244 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 12.6
96% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 18.7
54% 121 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 91%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$128
133GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SYSTEM 4KALIGNED
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,794
Write 1,211
Mixed 1,196
310% 1,400 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 93.3
4K Mixed 34
168% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 99.7
99% 160 MB/s
Poor: 169%
This bench: 204%
Great: 269%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 29.4
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 41.1
SC Mixed 27.8
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 111%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 1,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $943
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $288Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $285AMD RX 480 $240Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $110
Intel Core i5-7600K $200Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $154
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $189SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $55Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $195SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback