Toshiba SATELLITE L850D-13F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE L850D-13F  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD PLCSC8
Memory2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121206
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 13 '17 at 19:42
Run Duration100 Seconds
Run User ISL-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-4500M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 72.8
1-Core 46.9
2-Core 78.1
44% 65.9 Pts
4-Core 122
8-Core 122
16% 122 Pts
64-Core 121
8% 121 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7500/7600 Dual Graphics
Toshiba(1179 FB3B) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.6% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 5.19
Parallax 3.56
4% 4.41 fps
MRender 4.48
Gravity 3
Splatting 5.13
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.6%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Z400s 128GB-$109
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2320000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 478
Write 174
Mixed 257
66% 303 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 32.3
4K Mixed 3.44
45% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 85.4
DQ Write 59.9
DQ Mixed 26.2
32% 57.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CK0 M471B5173BH0-CK0 6GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.6% Poor
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 9.8
28% 9.67 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 9.2
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 95
42% 95 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback