| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 86.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus M4A88TD-M/USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120809 |
| Uptime | 2.9 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 13 '17 at 17:58 |
| Run Duration | 84 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59.4%
Above average
|
50% 76.8 Pts
|
29% 230 Pts
|
17% 273 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 Fury-X-$781
Asus(1043 04A6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.7%
Above average
|
56% 73.6 fps
|
55% 65.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
86.5%
Excellent
|
76% 344 MB/s
|
126% 40.1 MB/s
|
70% 115 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
31.9%
Below average
|
31% 10.9 GB/s
|
20% 6.87 GB/s
|
55% 72.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M4A88TD-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 33 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M4A88TD-M/USB3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 5x |
| Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 4x |
| Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 5,806 samples | 5x |
| HD 6870AMDBench 15%, 25,443 samples | 2x |
| R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $144 |