Monster TULPAR T7 V12.2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive	63.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Monster TULPAR T7 V12.2 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER TULPAR T7 V12.2
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170320
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '17 at 10:14
Run Duration	95 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	93.2% Outstanding	Memory 93.3 1-Core 134 2-Core 267 92% 165 Pts	4-Core 501 8-Core 738 77% 620 Pts	64-Core 732 45% 732 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 92%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49 58,154 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	63.8% Good	Read 165 Write 176 Mixed 510 64% 284 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 134 4K Mixed 23.4 145% 62.3 MB/s	DQ Read 29.2 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 19.6 36% 67.1 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 157%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 89,596 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 135GB free Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 84 64 239296355 (03) Spinup time 99 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2912 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 74 60 26219838 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 33268816676989 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 205 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 5 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 52 41 874184752 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 2 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 82 82 36083 (C2) HDA temperature 48 59 64424509488 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 112884625441722 (F1) Unknown 100 253 8480638088 (F2) Unknown 100 253 7872498186 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	55.3% Above average	Read 97.6 Write 93.8 Mixed 56.6 61% 82.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.82 4K Write 5.07 4K Mixed 0.3 161% 2.06 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905624-013.A00G 2x8GB 117 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	79.3% Very good	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 30.8 MC Mixed 22.4 79% 27.6 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 33.1 SC Mixed 24.6 73% 25.4 GB/s	Latency 61.3 65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T7 V12.2 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 71%

Battleship

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V12.2

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	3x
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1080 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 95%, 17,197 samples	3x
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	1x

SSD
SSDPEKKF256G8L 256GBIntelBench 169%, 6,515 samples	1x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	1x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	1x

RAM
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 77%, 3,102 samples	1x
9905624-013.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 73%, 117 samples	1x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 75%, 4,823 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $242

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16