Asus UX32VD

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 79% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus UX32VD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK UX32VD
Memory	7.5 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130129
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '17 at 22:58
Run Duration	92 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	26%
CPU Throttled	79%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3537U 17,065 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Memory 88.1 1-Core 84.9 2-Core 136 64% 103 Pts	4-Core 203 8-Core 203 27% 203 Pts	64-Core 204 13% 204 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1507) 2.5GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.41% Terrible	Lighting 3.83 Reflection 5.27 Parallax 2.88 3% 3.99 fps	MRender 3.95 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 7.26 4% 4.52 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.41% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT0AB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10332 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3024 (B1) Unknown 89 89 122 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 52 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 194 (F1) Unknown 99 99 49792612492	52.9% Above average	Read 497 Write 248 Mixed 211 70% 319 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 34.7 4K Mixed 9.5 57% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 19.2 DQ Write 37.7 DQ Mixed 9.52 13% 22.1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMSX8GX3M1A1600C10 Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-PB 10GB 138 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 2048 MB Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	29.2% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 8.5 26% 9.07 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 8.9 27% 9.3 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical UX32VD Builds (Compare 187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Asus UX32VD

CPU
Core i7-3517UIntelBench 51%, 8,454 samples	103x
Core i5-3317UIntel $225Bench 47%, 26,848 samples	57x
Core i7-3537UIntelBench 52%, 17,065 samples	18x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	166x
GeForce GT620MNvidiaBench 3%, 886 samples	18x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	3x

SSD
SD5SF2256G1002E 256GBSandiskBench 58%, 34 samples	7x
MX500 500GBCrucial $48Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	7x
840 250GBSamsung $251Bench 70%, 41,998 samples	6x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB HMT325S6CFR8C-PB 6GBHynixBench 41%, 1,509 samples	21x
SSZ302G08-GGNHC Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-PB 4GBAsintBench 44%, 252 samples	18x
99U5428-063.A00LF Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-PB 10GBKingstonBench 35%, 80 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16