Lenovo 20266

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

CPU throttled at 74% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Lenovo 20266 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Yoga2
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20131031
Uptime	171.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '17 at 17:37
Run Duration	93 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	3%
CPU Throttled	74%

PC Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4500U-$393 39,249 User benchmarks, average bench 50% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Memory 92 1-Core 85.7 2-Core 146 67% 108 Pts	4-Core 205 8-Core 205 27% 205 Pts	64-Core 207 13% 207 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 3978) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3304 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	4.03% Terrible	Lighting 4.53 Reflection 6.42 Parallax 6.5 4% 5.82 fps	MRender 6.9 Gravity 2.03 Splatting 7.57 5% 5.5 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.03% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTD256HAGM-000L1 256GB 987 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT43L0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1089 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 259 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 96 96 40 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 6240 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 52 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 3 (E9) Unknown 199 199 4995722 (EA) Unknown 99 99 3 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2 (EC) Unknown 99 99 6 (ED) Unknown 99 99 40 (EE) Unknown 100 100 0	67% Good	Read 491 Write 233 Mixed 210 68% 311 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 53.8 4K Mixed 11.8 80% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 248 DQ Write 210 DQ Mixed 30.5 77% 163 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM 0h clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	MC Read 20 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 18 56% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 19.7 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 64.2 62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 20266 Builds (Compare 252 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20266

CPU
Core i7-4510UIntelBench 47%, 63,054 samples	112x
Core i7-4500UIntel $393Bench 50%, 39,249 samples	88x
Core i5-4200UIntel $281Bench 43%, 64,450 samples	32x

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	252x

SSD
MZMTE256HMHP-000L1 256GBSamsungBench 65%, 1,116 samples	85x
MZMTD256HAGM-000L1 256GBSamsungBench 57%, 987 samples	44x
MZMTE512HMHP-00000 512GBSamsungBench 72%, 360 samples	17x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	222x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	29x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16