| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 4.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | HP Z1 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3561h |
| Memory | 26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130403 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 11 '17 at 09:48 |
| Run Duration | 325 Seconds |
| Run User | ZAF-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68.9%
Good
|
68% 120 Pts
|
47% 354 Pts
|
22% 356 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD P4000 (Server 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 3561) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3383
|
4.25%
Terrible
|
4% 4.65 fps
|
5% 5.94 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
67.8%
Good
|
88% 117 MB/s
|
78% 0.63 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB
2GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
7.11%
Terrible
|
10% 10.6 MB/s
|
75% 2.41 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M391B1G73BH0-CK0 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
50.3%
Above average
|
51% 17.8 GB/s
|
41% 14.3 GB/s
|
46% 87.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z1 Workstation Builds (Compare 73 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z1 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E3-1245IntelBench 70%, 3,302 samples | 29x |
| Xeon E3-1245 V2Intel $368Bench 73%, 2,442 samples | 15x |
| Xeon E31280IntelBench 73%, 472 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro 1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 6,108 samples | 28x |
| HD Graphics P3000IntelBench 2%, 729 samples | 9x |
| Quadro 3000MNvidiaBench 6%, 2,560 samples | 9x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 13% - Very poor | Total price: $100 |