PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 23.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Killer (all builds) |
Memory | 13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20141014 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 11 '17 at 04:08 |
Run Duration | 303 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 14% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
65.4%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290X-$549
AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.9.1
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk X110 mSATA 128GB-$80
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X230500 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
23.7%
Poor
|
|||
83.4%
Excellent
|
||||
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 9917
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
4.47%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
40.3%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 138x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 29x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 19x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 22x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 18x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $494 |