Asus Z97-PRO (Wi-Fi ac)

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	81.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus Z97-PRO (Wi-Fi ac) (all builds)
Memory	8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20151027
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 10 '17 at 14:24
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 0.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Memory 96.6 1-Core 124 2-Core 245 88% 155 Pts	4-Core 416 8-Core 645 66% 530 Pts	64-Core 639 40% 639 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% AMD(1002 6B76) CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.9.1 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	81.1% Excellent	Lighting 96.5 Reflection 82.9 Parallax 129 79% 103 fps	MRender 85.7 Gravity 98 Splatting 123 86% 102 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 85%
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8534) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4578 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	163% Outstanding	Read 730 Write 549 Mixed 574 137% 617 MB/s	4K Read 65.7 4K Write 168 4K Mixed 46 247% 93.1 MB/s	DQ Read 718 DQ Write 530 DQ Mixed 271 298% 506 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 163% Great: 236%
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB 6,973 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 606GB free Firmware: CC34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 227428015 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2766 (05) Reallocated sector count 98 98 99 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 384209835 (09) Power-on hours count 45 45 48186 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 4046 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 21475164166 (BD) vendor-specific 77 77 23 (BE) vendor-specific 65 47 638976035 (C2) HDA temperature 35 53 30064771107 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 26 13 227428015 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 131576323162011 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2450636036 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1913516063	60.3% Good	Read 110 Write 100 Mixed 101 78% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.51 108% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 69%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140 11,698 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 117GB free Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 217 6391 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4069 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 34 34 48239 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1112 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 481 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3956 (C2) HDA temperature 110 84 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	48.1% Average	Read 93.2 Write 74 Mixed 76 61% 81.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 2.17 4K Mixed 0.52 130% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB 3,839 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz clocked @ 1932 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	69.4% Good	MC Read 24.7 MC Write 25.3 MC Mixed 21.3 68% 23.8 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 22.3 SC Mixed 23 60% 21.1 GB/s	Latency 52 77% 52 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z97-PRO(Wi-Fi ac) Builds (Compare 983 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO (Wi-Fi ac)

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	583x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	130x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	84x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	140x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	55x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	52x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	36x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	29x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	48x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	31x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $678

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16