Asus P7P55D-E

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	9.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	26.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D-E (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101029
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '17 at 11:09
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 550-$110 19,058 User benchmarks, average bench 47% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	49.3% Average	Memory 66 1-Core 74.6 2-Core 137 54% 92.5 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 190 25% 190 Pts	64-Core 192 12% 192 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 25,436 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Asus(1043 8366) 1GB CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	9.59% Terrible	Lighting 11.2 Reflection 13.2 Parallax 9.41 9% 11.3 fps	MRender 14.7 Gravity 11.6 Splatting 12.6 10% 12.9 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.59% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: 507KC4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 107 107 15356767 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 -49478023241911 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3298 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 225 (B1) Unknown 0 0 6 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 30 48 60132687902 (C2) HDA temperature 30 48 60132687902 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 15356767 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 15356767 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 15356767 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 16220 (EA) Unknown 0 0 7869 (F1) Unknown 0 0 7869 (F2) Unknown 0 0 12576	26.1% Poor	Read 153 Write 69.4 Mixed 103 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 11.4 4K Mixed 9.39 50% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 27.5 DQ Write 16 DQ Mixed 14.1 13% 19.2 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 87%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 187GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 141 140 3925 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6163 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 16755 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5548 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 143 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6019 (C2) HDA temperature 111 87 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	64.5% Good	Read 122 Write 103 Mixed 109 84% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.26 79% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 69%
Seagate ST3250620A 250GB-$80 471 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 33GB free Firmware: 3.AAC Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 89 108598511 (03) Spinup time 90 89 0 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 11051 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 80 59 101136301 (09) Power-on hours count 63 63 33133 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8270 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 37 756482091 (C2) HDA temperature 43 63 47244640299 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 83 52 226895954 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 257 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	34.1% Below average	Read 60.6 Write 58.2 Mixed 38.3 39% 52.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.35 82% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.8% Poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 7.5 22% 7.63 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 6.7 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D-E Builds (Compare 779 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	257x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	156x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	142x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	70x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	45x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	43x

SSD
AGILITY3 60GBOCZBench 42%, 14,293 samples	23x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	20x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	325x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	230x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	90x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $159

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16