Hasee QTK5

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Hasee QTK5 (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140627
Uptime	6.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '17 at 02:40
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4300M-$264 13,678 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 86.3 1-Core 94.8 2-Core 176 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 249 8-Core 252 34% 250 Pts	64-Core 246 15% 246 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Quanta(152D 1025) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	4% Terrible	Lighting 4.17 Reflection 15.8 Parallax 6.91 3% 8.95 fps	MRender 7.33 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 8.39 5% 6.07 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1562 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 780 (B1) Unknown 98 98 22 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 48 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 7 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12167501701	86.2% Excellent	Read 494 Write 403 Mixed 406 97% 434 MB/s	4K Read 36.9 4K Write 70.7 4K Mixed 21.9 121% 43.2 MB/s	DQ Read 40.5 DQ Write 241 DQ Mixed 22.2 52% 101 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 124%
ASMT 2115 500GB 2,879 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 370GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	50.1% Above average	Read 123 Write 123 Mixed 81.4 137% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.2 67% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 166%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6N1 CT102464BF160B.M16 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 15.5 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 15.2 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical QTK5 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Hasee QTK5

CPU
Core i7-4910MQIntel $110Bench 67%, 6,703 samples	2x
Core i7-4710MQIntel $50Bench 60%, 15,557 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	2x
GTX 960MNvidiaBench 16%, 73,363 samples	1x
GTX 860MNvidiaBench 16%, 18,736 samples	1x

SSD
1TB 1TBSKBench 125%, 14 samples	2x
IT SMS-128L9M 128GBLiteonBench 74%, 59 samples	1x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	1x

RAM
M471B1G73DH0-YK0 M471B1G73QH0-YK0 16GBSamsungBench 43%, 3 samples	2x
9905428-087.A00LF 99U5428-018.A00LF 16GBKingstonBench 54%, 28 samples	1x
CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 2x4GBCrucialBench 46%, 1,163 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $110

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16