Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	61.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Supermicro X9DRG-QF (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DRG-QF
Memory	59.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150325
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '17 at 00:44
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 741 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Memory 83.3 1-Core 86.6 2-Core 160 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 635 58% 486 Pts	64-Core 1,596 99% 1,596 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Zotac(19DA 1370) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	61.8% Good	Lighting 78.6 Reflection 83.3 Parallax 75.7 64% 79.2 fps	MRender 78.1 Gravity 69.9 Splatting 65 57% 71 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 66%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GB 6,630 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT04L6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7412 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3166 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 85 85 175 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 6240 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 46 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (E9) Unknown 199 199 13610627 (EA) Unknown 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 56 (EC) Unknown 99 99 121 (ED) Unknown 99 99 175 (EE) Unknown 100 100 0	37.5% Below average	Read 387 Write 37.1 Mixed 84.1 36% 169 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 24.3 4K Mixed 10.3 54% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 149 DQ Write 25.5 DQ Mixed 21.1 32% 65.3 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M392B1K70CM0-CH9 8x8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 8 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	MC Read 38.3 MC Write 34.1 MC Mixed 31.5 99% 34.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 7.2 24% 8.57 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 87%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	3x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v21stBench 63%, 551 samples	3x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	3x

GPU
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	2x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	2x
GTX 780-TiNvidia $410Bench 53%, 30,815 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	3x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	1x
MZ7WD240HAFV-00003 240GBSamsungBench 76%, 153 samples	1x

RAM
36JSF2G72PZ-1G9E1 8x16GBMicronBench 102%, 71 samples	3x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	1x
16x16GBUnknownBench 79%, 61 samples	1x

Value: 34% - Below average

Total price: $130

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16