bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110921
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateSep 08 '17 at 23:51
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 168
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 288
41% 301 Pts
64-Core 317
20% 317 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
MSI(1462 2842) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.19
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Lighting 37.8
Reflection 35.2
Parallax 44.5
31% 39.2 fps
MRender 48.3
Gravity 42.7
Splatting 35.8
34% 42.3 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSA2BW080G3H 80GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10365 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 231
Write 89.6
Mixed 113
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 32.6
4K Mixed 13.2
59% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 59.4
DQ Mixed 30.8
40% 74.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 45%
Samsung HD250HJ 250GB
58GB free
Firmware: FH100-06 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
41% Average
Read 70.5
Write 72.4
Mixed 72.2
54% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.29
4K Mixed 0.39
92% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41%
Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$34
31GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
77% Very good
Read 143
Write 125
Mixed 134
101% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.27
82% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77%
Great: 112%
WD USB Elements Device 1TB
54GB free, PID 6031
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 34.3
Write 34.4
Mixed 33.9
44% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.2
69% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.8% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.6
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 12.6
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,245 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback