Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	94% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V LX (all builds)
Memory	7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140721
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 08 '17 at 14:35
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Memory 95 1-Core 113 2-Core 213 81% 140 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 538 55% 446 Pts	64-Core 542 34% 542 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435 47,610 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Asus(1043 83F8) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27% Poor	Lighting 31.6 Reflection 30.4 Parallax 39.1 26% 33.7 fps	MRender 43.1 Gravity 35.6 Splatting 30.8 29% 36.5 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 949 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 15 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 52 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2623236400	94% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 405 Mixed 412 98% 439 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 61.4 4K Mixed 37.8 133% 44.6 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 81.6 88% 148 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 966GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 199 199 3640 (03) Spinup time 186 164 5658 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4741 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 1 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 32 32 49939 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1540 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 509 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 789569 (C2) HDA temperature 114 87 36 (C4) Reallocation count 199 199 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 61 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 39 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 268 (C8) Write error rate 199 199 271	46.7% Average	Read 87.5 Write 75.2 Mixed 77.4 60% 80 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.14 54% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 67%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 100GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 171 2300 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1742 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 25864 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 976 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 192 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1590 (C2) HDA temperature 104 88 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	70.2% Very good	Read 129 Write 116 Mixed 96.5 85% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 2.08 4K Mixed 0.24 86% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 39GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 68 68 10260 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 3989 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 95 95 16761 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 61175 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 9 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2052 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 43 572260385 (C2) HDA temperature 67 40 262598361121 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 54742 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 13 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	35.3% Below average	Read 64 Write 58.5 Mixed 65.3 47% 62.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.43 99% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3-1600 2x8GB 743 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 17.5 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 17.6 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 57.2 70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,607 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	1,403x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,164x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	1,071x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	374x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	366x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	301x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	214x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	195x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	149x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	138x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	131x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	105x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $364

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16