ACER Aspire M1640

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemACER Aspire M1640  (all builds)
MotherboardACER MCP73
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080416
Uptime7.6 Days
Run DateSep 08 '17 at 12:35
Run Duration1148 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E4700-$150
SOCKET775 M/B, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
40.3% Average
Memory 71.9
1-Core 29.2
2-Core 52.5
36% 51.2 Pts
4-Core 53.8
8-Core 56.6
7% 55.2 Pts
64-Core 54.5
3% 54.5 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
EVGA(3842 1313) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.07% Terrible
Lighting 1.17
Reflection 2.31
Parallax 0.44
1% 1.3 fps
MRender 2.29
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.59 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.07%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 541A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 160
Write 146
Mixed 105
30% 137 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 7.73
53% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 19.8
DQ Write 46.4
DQ Mixed 8.49
14% 24.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
119GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 78.2
Write 90.1
Mixed 90.4
65% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.32
81% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
81GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 56.8
Write 51.6
Mixed 52.7
40% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.24
66% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 43%
Generic USB SD Reader 2GB
2GB free, PID 9360
Operating at USB 1.1 Speed
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
1.46% Terrible
Read 0.95
Write 0.9
Mixed 0.93
1% 0.93 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 0.33
4K Mixed 0.24
21% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.46%
Great: 2%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.8% Very poor
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 2.8
9% 3.27 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 2.3
8% 2.93 GB/s
Latency 97.1
41% 97.1 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M1640 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: ACER Aspire M1640

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $82
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback