ADD TO PC
BUILD

Averatec TS-42C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Averatec TS-42C (all builds)
Motherboard	To H34
Memory	1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100609
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 08 '17 at 07:46
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70 23,644 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	47.8% Average	Memory 66.8 1-Core 70 2-Core 130 53% 88.9 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 169 22% 169 Pts	64-Core 169 10% 169 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310M 8,303 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1B0A 2040) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.39% Terrible	Lighting 1.47 Reflection 2.92 Parallax 0.53 1% 1.64 fps	MRender 3.48 Gravity 0.97 Splatting 2.17 2% 2.21 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.39% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK2565GSX 250GB 2,503 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 211GB free (System drive) Firmware: GJ00 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1205 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2675 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 11546 (0A) Spinup retry count 153 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2657 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 27 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 93 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 61373 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 219043659809 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 57 (DE) Loaded hours 75 75 10289 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 305 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	36.1% Below average	Read 62.5 Write 63.3 Mixed 54.3 45% 60 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 0.99 4K Mixed 0.26 60% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 40%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 0GB free, PID 024a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	8.52% Terrible	Read 24.6 Write 16.9 Mixed 14.8 22% 18.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.27 4K Write 0.009 4K Mixed 0.006 20% 1.76 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.52% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5673FH0-CF8 802C 16JSF25664HZ-1G4F1 4GB 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25.2% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 10.8 25% 8.6 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 6.8 18% 6.4 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback