Supermicro X9DR3-F

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Supermicro X9DR3-F (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DR3-F
Memory	19.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150709
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Sep 07 '17 at 00:41
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	40%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0 2,388 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 84.9 1-Core 78.8 2-Core 165 65% 110 Pts	4-Core 309 8-Core 551 52% 430 Pts	64-Core 1,336 83% 1,336 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3733) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.7% Below average	Lighting 40.4 Reflection 26.8 Parallax 30.8 33% 32.7 fps	MRender 35.1 Gravity 39.2 Splatting 34.1 30% 36.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 348GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 24 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 8 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 63 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 4 (F1) Unknown 99 99 773571325	84.9% Excellent	Read 510 Write 395 Mixed 414 98% 440 MB/s	4K Read 34.6 4K Write 41.6 4K Mixed 32.3 116% 36.2 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 62 DQ Mixed 43.9 49% 84.5 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 254GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5842 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 62 (B1) Unknown 61 61 811 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 55 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 33 (F1) Unknown 99 99 227793121668	61% Good	Read 487 Write 164 Mixed 225 64% 292 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 41.1 4K Mixed 21.7 88% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 65.5 DQ Mixed 42.9 49% 85.3 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 134%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 390GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 253 253 7241 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1596 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 60 60 29753 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 216 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 150 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1445 (C2) HDA temperature 116 91 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	49.7% Average	Read 81.1 Write 91.7 Mixed 117 74% 96.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.29 102% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0- 8x16GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 8 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	84.9% Excellent	MC Read 38.2 MC Write 32.7 MC Mixed 31.1 97% 34 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 7.7 25% 8.77 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DR3-F Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

System: Supermicro X9DR3-F

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples	6x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 66%, 741 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	4x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	3x

SSD
WDS240G2G0A- 240GBWDCBench 42%, 495 samples	3x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	3x
MX500 500GBCrucial $55Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	3x

RAM
M393B2G70BH0- 8x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 52 samples	6x
M393B1K70QB0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 96%, 634 samples	3x
M393B2G70QH0- 16x16GBSamsungBench 99%, 14 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16