Lenovo 20FAS70703

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20FAS70703  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20FAS70703
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170210
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateSep 06 '17 at 20:03
Run Duration90 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 90.3
2-Core 162
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 214
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 2233) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4590
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.4% Terrible
Lighting 5.67
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 5.38
5% 6.51 fps
MRender 7.19
Gravity 5.03
Splatting 11.8
7% 8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.4%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshib THNSNJ512GDNU A 512GB
355GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYLA
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 366
Write 148
Mixed 257
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 25.2
88% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 79.2
DQ Mixed 124
102% 152 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.1% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.6
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 10.9
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback