Dixonsxp A6VMX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDixonsxp A6VMX  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN A6VMX
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20080619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '17 at 17:01
Run Duration575 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Processor model unknown
Socket 940, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 86.1
1-Core 32.1
2-Core 50
42% 56.1 Pts
4-Core 46.6
8-Core 54.1
6% 50.3 Pts
64-Core 51.4
3% 51.4 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 102
Write 97.5
Mixed 31.2
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 0.86
4K Mixed 0.2
51% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 70%
25GB free, PID 6387
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.91% Terrible
Read 11.9
Write 3.73
Mixed 4.43
7% 6.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.49
4K Write 0.004
4K Mixed 0.003
6% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.91%
Great: 7%
Verbatim STORE N GO 8GB
7GB free, PID 0302
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
3.8% Terrible
Read 15.4
Write 3.69
Mixed 3.51
7% 7.54 MB/s
4K Read 3.18
4K Write 0.003
4K Mixed 0.003
12% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.8%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
20.3% Poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 7.2
18% 6.33 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 4.4
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback