Lenovo 20B7S0N10J

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 20B7S0N10J  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20B7S0N10J
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131210
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 04 '17 at 15:48
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 81.7
2-Core 140
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 202
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 220C) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3958
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.79% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 4.62
Parallax 6.28
4% 5.17 fps
MRender 4.24
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 6.83
4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.79%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GB-$209
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSTi Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 443
Write 142
Mixed 166
54% 251 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 18.9
110% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 42.8
73% 144 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
32.8% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 9.2
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.5
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback