Asus CG5275

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus CG5275 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CG5275
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091112
Uptime	7 Days
Run Date	Sep 04 '17 at 02:58
Run Duration	711 Seconds
Run User	PAN-User
Background CPU	60%

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	Memory 55.4 1-Core 57.2 2-Core 97.5 42% 70 Pts	4-Core 137 8-Core 151 19% 144 Pts	64-Core 159 10% 159 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GS 352 User benchmarks, average bench 5% XFX(1682 2335) 384MB Ram: 384MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	3.36% Terrible	Lighting 3.67 Reflection 3.96 Parallax 1.69 3% 3.11 fps	MRender 5.71 Gravity 5.33 Splatting 4.26 4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.36% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: ST6OA31B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 120 120 38686228953 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3241 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 21050 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3214 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 3721 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 3721 (C2) HDA temperature 122 122 249109348401 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	36% Below average	Read 49.8 Write 75.3 Mixed 56.1 45% 60.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.26 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.24 68% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 7GB free Firmware: CC34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 118453957 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3237 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 30 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 95799413 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 21574 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3238 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 47 807206955 (C2) HDA temperature 43 53 64424509483 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 24 17 118453957 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -34913789120000 (F1) Unknown 100 253 284243135 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3117007263	25.1% Poor	Read 48.3 Write 39 Mixed 22.4 27% 36.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.97 4K Mixed 0.28 66% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 68%
USB DISK Pro 32GB 141 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 25GB free, PID 4123 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	2.23% Terrible	Read 8.9 Write 3.39 Mixed 4.21 6% 5.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.79 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.006 3% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.23% Great: 9%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB 7,719 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 7GB free, PID a81d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	3.39% Terrible	Read 11.3 Write 5.09 Mixed 5.83 8% 7.42 MB/s	4K Read 2.62 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.001 10% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 3.39% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	27.3% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 10.7 28% 9.63 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 8 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 142 28% 142 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CG5275 Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Asus CG5275

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	53x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	4x
Xeon X3440IntelBench 65%, 6,034 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	10x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	5x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	4x

SSD
SHGS31-1000GS-2 1TBBench 98%, 11,576 samples	4x
SSD 256GBBench 72%, 6,980 samples	3x
CS900 240GBPNY $22Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	3x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	38x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	10x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $70

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16