MSI B350M MORTAR (MS-7A37)

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	MSI MS-7A37
Motherboard	MSI B350M MORTAR (MS-7A37) (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170727
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 03 '17 at 12:26
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100 83,528 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Memory 74.7 1-Core 114 2-Core 227 76% 139 Pts	4-Core 424 8-Core 435 57% 430 Pts	64-Core 434 27% 434 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7770 38,053 User benchmarks, average bench 12% XFX(1682 3232) 1GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Lighting 16.5 Reflection 16.8 Parallax 22.7 14% 18.7 fps	MRender 14 Gravity 15.3 Splatting 18.7 13% 16 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 155GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 22542 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1514 (B1) Unknown 89 89 131 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 54 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 1 1 233685 (EB) Unknown 99 99 99 (F1) Unknown 99 99 54096484717	72.4% Very good	Read 507 Write 350 Mixed 341 88% 399 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 46.8 4K Mixed 15.4 97% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 34.3 DQ Write 88.7 DQ Mixed 16 25% 46.3 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 118%
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76 24,219 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 6GB free Firmware: 505ABBF1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 3768626 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 68 68 65231963320349 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6234 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 165 (B1) Unknown 0 0 11 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 24 67 68723867672 (C2) HDA temperature 24 67 68723867672 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 3768626 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 3768626 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 3768626 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 79 79 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 55056 (EA) Unknown 0 0 23053 (F1) Unknown 0 0 23053 (F2) Unknown 0 0 11853	55.1% Above average	Read 455 Write 86.4 Mixed 153 50% 232 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 61.6 4K Mixed 17.5 93% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 80.3 DQ Mixed 29.9 40% 74.6 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 69%
Hitachi HTS545025B9A300 250GB 8,875 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 185GB free Firmware: PB2OC60F Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 223 223 60129542145 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 4047 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 4299 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2818 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 64 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 33450 (C2) HDA temperature 220 220 287763398681 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	44.7% Average	Read 77.8 Write 78 Mixed 71.5 57% 75.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 1.11 4K Mixed 0.29 66% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBR2 2x8GB 1,457 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	88.7% Excellent	MC Read 33.9 MC Write 32.7 MC Mixed 30.8 93% 32.5 GB/s	SC Read 21.1 SC Write 30.1 SC Mixed 26 74% 25.7 GB/s	Latency 90.9 44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B350M MORTAR (MS-7A37) Builds (Compare 728 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 46%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B350M MORTAR (MS-7A37)

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	183x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	77x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	58x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	79x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	47x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	46x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	24x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	24x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	16x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	32x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	19x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $319

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16