Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110217
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 02 '17 at 22:26
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 43
2-Core 86.1
50% 73.2 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 256
27% 214 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18% Very poor
Lighting 22.4
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 22.5
18% 20.6 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 17.1
18% 22 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160
252GB free
Firmware: M0CR011 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.8% Above average
Read 273
Write 240
Mixed 159
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 13.4
79% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 25.8
DQ Write 65.9
DQ Mixed 13.4
20% 35 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 104%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
61% Good
Read 288
Write 299
Mixed 211
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 19.7
98% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 34.4
DQ Write 57.5
DQ Mixed 19.6
22% 37.2 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 61%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
155GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 127
Write 139
Mixed 130
100% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 2.48
4K Mixed 0.22
92% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 250GB (2008)-$80
155GB free
Firmware: 12.01B02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 54.7
Write 79
Mixed 34.7
42% 56.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.41
4K Mixed 0.37
114% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 61%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
118GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 66.7
Write 58.4
Mixed 31.5
38% 52.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.32
100% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C9-8GAR F3-1600C9-8GAR 16GB
667, 667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
33.8% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 12.7
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback