Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170901
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '17 at 14:52
Run Duration	326 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Memory 80.2 1-Core 120 2-Core 236 81% 145 Pts	4-Core 477 8-Core 937 84% 707 Pts	64-Core 1,299 80% 1,299 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170 16,214 User benchmarks, average bench 11% Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Lighting 14 Reflection 13.6 Parallax 11 11% 12.9 fps	MRender 10.8 Gravity 13.5 Splatting 15.3 11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor M6e PCIe 256GB-$50 744 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 238GB free Firmware: 1.05 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1572 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 837 (B1) Unknown 100 100 18416 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 42 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 106690 (F2) Unknown 100 100 118864	120% Outstanding	Read 702 Write 538 Mixed 577 135% 606 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 82.7 4K Mixed 40 147% 52.3 MB/s	DQ Read 345 DQ Write 291 DQ Mixed 104 137% 247 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 131%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 221GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1160 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 151 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 60 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 51 (F1) Unknown 99 99 824323464	83.1% Excellent	Read 512 Write 415 Mixed 420 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 35.2 4K Mixed 22.9 80% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 314 DQ Write 251 DQ Mixed 118 133% 228 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 124%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	253% Outstanding	Read 2,682 Write 1,245 Mixed 1,380 388% 1,769 MB/s	4K Read 51.2 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 45.4 189% 65.6 MB/s	DQ Read 341 DQ Write 217 DQ Mixed 131 138% 230 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 253% Great: 236%
Intel X25-M 160GB 7,078 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 132GB free Firmware: 2CV102M3 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 17 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 43427 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2232 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 82 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 821671 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 10646889 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 1 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 3093333003 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 96 96 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0	43.2% Average	Read 256 Write 110 Mixed 152 38% 173 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 59 4K Mixed 7.19 73% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 87.1 DQ Mixed 47.9 58% 103 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 46%
Intel X25-M 120GB 1,606 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 112GB free Firmware: 2CV102HD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 16999 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1834 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 128 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 342927 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 18027 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 0 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 877417471 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 96 96 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0	43.4% Average	Read 256 Write 108 Mixed 158 38% 174 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 63.9 4K Mixed 7.09 76% 30.9 MB/s	DQ Read 151 DQ Write 92 DQ Mixed 45.7 54% 96.3 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 46%
Toshiba HDWQ140 4TB 4,700 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 3TB free Firmware: FJ1M Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7039 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 158 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 951 (0A) Spinup retry count 103 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 82 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 824 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 158914969632 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 99 99 431 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 551 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	101% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 175 Mixed 169 131% 174 MB/s	4K Read 1.65 4K Write 2.87 4K Mixed 0.68 197% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 41GB free Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 3928 (03) Spinup time 92 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 7118 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 76 60 42432708 (09) Power-on hours count 58 58 37461 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1743 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 25770328074 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 53 13406699551 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 80 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 8374 (C2) HDA temperature 31 47 -140737488355297 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 18 3 3928 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 73504070324425 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2752397413 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2486409619	47% Average	Read 89.2 Write 74.6 Mixed 64.2 57% 76 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 0.83 4K Mixed 0.38 80% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 35GB free Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 168 (03) Spinup time 92 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 6032 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 80 60 101669588 (09) Power-on hours count 63 63 32955 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1744 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 97 4295622675 (BD) vendor-specific 84 84 16 (BE) vendor-specific 68 51 4833607712 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 86 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 6889 (C2) HDA temperature 32 49 -140737488355296 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 32 6 168 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 21324512655474 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3079917029 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3128404639	56.9% Above average	Read 93 Write 106 Mixed 68.7 66% 89.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 0.88 4K Mixed 0.55 92% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 75%
WD My Book 1TB 10,299 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 650GB free, PID 1100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Read 36.3 Write 31.9 Mixed 11.8 31% 26.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 2.21 4K Mixed 0.29 87% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x16GB 3,147 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	MC Read 39.6 MC Write 35.7 MC Mixed 34.1 104% 36.5 GB/s	SC Read 23.1 SC Write 38.6 SC Mixed 28 85% 29.9 GB/s	Latency 80.1 50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $871

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)