Asrock FM2A88M-HD+

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A88M-HD+ (all builds)
Memory	0.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140117
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '17 at 13:15
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	54%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka) 11,026 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	29.6% Poor	Memory 35.4 1-Core 53.6 2-Core 99 35% 62.7 Pts	4-Core 137 8-Core 144 19% 141 Pts	64-Core 156 10% 156 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	21.8% Poor	Lighting 25.7 Reflection 23.3 Parallax 31.1 21% 26.7 fps	MRender 32.4 Gravity 30 Splatting 24.8 23% 29 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 21%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 754GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 1 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7320 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 479 (B1) Unknown 98 98 34 (B3) Unknown 99 99 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 99 99 1 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 47 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 139 (F1) Unknown 99 99 74301947501	75.3% Very good	Read 474 Write 370 Mixed 393 92% 412 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 43.9 4K Mixed 23.6 97% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 87.6 DQ Mixed 39.4 46% 78.9 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB 6,893 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	17.7% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 6.5 19% 6.5 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 4 10% 3.6 GB/s	Latency 225 18% 225 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A88M-HD+ Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M-HD+ - $67

CPU
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	10x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	10x
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	8x
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	5x
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	5x

SSD
840 120GBSamsung $109Bench 61%, 51,792 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	2x

RAM
ValueSelect DDR3 1600 C11 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 2,884 samples	4x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 1x4GBKingstonBench 28%, 5,300 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $323

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16