HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3047h
Memory	12 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100804
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '17 at 03:39
Run Duration	358 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 B97 1,103 User benchmarks, average bench 55% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	53.9% Above average	Memory 82.7 1-Core 46.7 2-Core 93.3 49% 74.2 Pts	4-Core 145 8-Core 164 20% 155 Pts	64-Core 174 11% 174 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6350 2,808 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2126) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.21% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 2.04 Parallax 1.69 1% 1.71 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 2.04 1% 1.59 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.21% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: 18.01H18 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 147 145 3633 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 383 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 54 54 33700 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 372 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 97 20 (BE) vendor-specific 57 51 774373419 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 97 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 285 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	63.3% Good	Read 111 Write 109 Mixed 97 80% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.22 70% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 70%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 860GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 24.5 Write 22.4 Mixed 19.5 28% 22.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.61 4K Mixed 0.23 64% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 4,255 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 461GB free, PID 0200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 23.8 Write 23.4 Mixed 13.2 25% 20.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 0.19 58% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 6,017 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 310GB free, PID a007 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 23.4 Write 23.4 Mixed 15.8 26% 20.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.28 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.17 53% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 43%
WD 1600AAJ External 160GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 108GB free, PID 0910 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 24.1 Write 22.9 Mixed 15.8 26% 20.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 0.28 73% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 18%
WD My Passport 0740 320GB 363 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 28GB free, PID 0740 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 24.6 Write 23.1 Mixed 20.5 29% 22.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.34 4K Mixed 0.2 54% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 ID:00 00 ID:00 00 49GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.6% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 12 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 8.7 20% 7.1 GB/s	Latency 75.8 53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

CPU
Athlon II X2 B24AMDBench 42%, 2,045 samples	53x
Phenom II X4 B95AMDBench 53%, 2,408 samples	44x
Phenom II X4 B97AMDBench 55%, 1,103 samples	22x

GPU
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	150x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	17x
GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples	7x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x

RAM
ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G 49GBUnknownBench 33%, 13 samples	4x
ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 37GBUnknownBench 28%, 75 samples	3x
ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 37GBUnknownBench 29%, 75 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16