Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics61.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160603
Uptime21.9 Days
Run DateSep 02 '17 at 01:09
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 121
2-Core 240
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 765
77% 624 Pts
64-Core 951
59% 951 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.5% Good
Lighting 77.5
Reflection 76.4
Parallax 66.1
63% 73.3 fps
MRender 71.3
Gravity 69.4
Splatting 72.2
58% 71 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ST3120213AS 500GB
342GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
128% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 499
Mixed 505
113% 506 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 55.7
199% 71.5 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 154
170% 287 MB/s
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
278GB free
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 2,306
Write 1,468
Mixed 1,535
391% 1,770 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 48.4
180% 69 MB/s
DQ Read 425
DQ Write 391
DQ Mixed 201
208% 339 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 255%
Great: 283%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
33GB free
Firmware: SD17 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 63.3
Write 58.7
Mixed 60.4
46% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.43
4K Mixed 0.33
93% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 70%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
28GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 78.1
Write 82.3
Mixed 76.9
60% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.25
73% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 74%
Seagate ST3120213AS 120GB
24GB free
Firmware: 3.AHL Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 40.1
Write 45
Mixed 48.9
34% 44.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.04
4K Mixed 0.33
69% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GX-D4-3000-MR 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 39.2
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 22.5
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 55
73% 55 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 105%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $982
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback