| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-HVGS (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110901 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 01 '17 at 16:32 |
| Run Duration | 85 Seconds |
| Run User | BGR-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.4%
Good
|
66% 112 Pts
|
29% 219 Pts
|
13% 206 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Palit(1569 104A) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 381.65
|
1.91%
Terrible
|
2% 2.3 fps
|
2% 2.32 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB
825GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
59.4%
Above average
|
58% 79 MB/s
|
74% 0.57 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown TMS4GB364E081139EE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
40.9%
Average
|
40% 13.9 GB/s
|
33% 11.5 GB/s
|
54% 74.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-HVGS Builds (Compare 135 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-HVGS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 17x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 13x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 11x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 9x |
| GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 9x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |