Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results


Gaming 110% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 93% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	87.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141001
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 01 '17 at 16:11
Run Duration	227 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Memory 93.6 1-Core 132 2-Core 262 91% 163 Pts	4-Core 425 8-Core 616 65% 521 Pts	64-Core 694 43% 694 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85F1) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	130% Outstanding	Lighting 181 Reflection 202 Parallax 180 148% 188 fps	MRender 131 Gravity 175 Splatting 130 118% 145 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB-$105 6,748 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 680GB free Firmware: X41000WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1634 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 426 (A5) Unknown 100 100 16711863 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 31 (A8) Unknown 100 100 11 (A9) Unknown 100 100 844 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 3 (AE) Unknown 100 100 16 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 70 61 261994053662 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 223341051956 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 3365 (EA) Unknown 100 100 4001 (F1) Unknown 253 253 4124 (F2) Unknown 253 253 3265 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	70.2% Very good	Read 492 Write 217 Mixed 263 71% 324 MB/s	4K Read 36.3 4K Write 87.6 4K Mixed 14.8 120% 46.2 MB/s	DQ Read 38 DQ Write 93.8 DQ Mixed 14.5 26% 48.8 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 108%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 66GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6707 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1476 (B1) Unknown 96 96 44 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 57 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 73 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12464191045	97.3% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 351 Mixed 343 88% 397 MB/s	4K Read 46.3 4K Write 87.1 4K Mixed 25.9 150% 53.1 MB/s	DQ Read 315 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 21.4 86% 192 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 108%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1092 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 261 (B1) Unknown 99 99 7 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 55 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 12 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6303722848	87.5% Excellent	Read 526 Write 237 Mixed 293 77% 352 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 25.3 160% 65 MB/s	DQ Read 39.2 DQ Write 212 DQ Mixed 25.4 49% 92.3 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 124%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 799GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 197 175 5150 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5426 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 12478 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2169 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 120 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 171 171 88504 (C2) HDA temperature 119 87 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 39 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 30 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 41	43% Average	Read 74.7 Write 74.6 Mixed 79.5 58% 76.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.02 4K Mixed 0.21 86% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 63%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 3 (03) Spinup time 142 130 3883 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4623 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 7059 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1520 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 1569 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 182 182 54242 (C2) HDA temperature 114 103 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	60.2% Good	Read 135 Write 74.3 Mixed 116 82% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 2.34 4K Mixed 0.13 85% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 85%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70 13,060 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 595GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 85 85 5380 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 9758 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 6996 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 1 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2886 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 61 487981084 (C2) HDA temperature 70 61 538312734 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 46930 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	63.5% Good	Read 111 Write 110 Mixed 112 84% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.98 4K Mixed 0.58 129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 23,732 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	60.2% Good	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 21.8 MC Mixed 18.1 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 23 SC Mixed 19.3 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 60.8 66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,769 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	1,614x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	441x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	222x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	400x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	227x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	155x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	107x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	102x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	79x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	108x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	105x
Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBHyperXBench 63%, 20,216 samples	91x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $940

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16