Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170406
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 01 '17 at 13:35
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	LVA-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	68.8% Good	Memory 74.8 1-Core 111 2-Core 223 75% 136 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 626 58% 482 Pts	64-Core 864 54% 864 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Lighting 75.9 Reflection 76.7 Parallax 67.1 62% 73.2 fps	MRender 70.6 Gravity 69.8 Splatting 70.1 58% 70.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: 608ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 26184419 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 -136863427852818 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 652 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 147 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 35 52 25773211683 (C2) HDA temperature 35 52 25773211683 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 26184419 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 26184419 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 26184419 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 38654705664 (E9) Unknown 0 0 3157 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2665 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2665 (F2) Unknown 0 0 4022 (F4) Unknown 100 100 2555925	54.7% Above average	Read 430 Write 122 Mixed 174 53% 242 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 77 4K Mixed 11.6 93% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 26.8 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 10.1 29% 57.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 514GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 73 63 24797526 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 150 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 62 60 1661745 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 159 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 37 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 68 471072796 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 156 (C2) HDA temperature 28 15 64424509468 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 1 1 24797526 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 135725261521001 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1187938041 (F2) Unknown 100 253 722984956	97.7% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 159 Mixed 137 119% 159 MB/s	4K Read 0.89 4K Write 1.63 4K Mixed 0.29 100% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 97.7% Great: 113%
Seagate ST3320613AS 320GB-$30 12,971 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 292GB free Firmware: CC2H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 220705870 (03) Spinup time 99 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5600 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 15 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 210842386 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 10153 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 97 37 3915 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032840 (BD) vendor-specific 69 69 31 (BE) vendor-specific 71 44 56322555933 (C2) HDA temperature 29 56 30064771101 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 36 33 220705870 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -61156039317870 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1089200997 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1594435463	63.3% Good	Read 114 Write 107 Mixed 89.4 77% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.01 4K Mixed 0.45 92% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBD 2x8GB 8,162 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	86% Excellent	MC Read 33 MC Write 31.6 MC Mixed 29.5 90% 31.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.8 SC Write 31.5 SC Mixed 24.3 72% 25.2 GB/s	Latency 90.8 44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)