HP Compaq 8200 Elite CM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite CM  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1494
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120322
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 01 '17 at 10:53
Run Duration497 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 81
1-Core 70.1
2-Core 148
60% 99.6 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 275
35% 267 Pts
64-Core 225
14% 225 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 63%
Great: 70%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1494) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.04% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 0.97
1% 1.16 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2
1% 1.55 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.04%
Great: 1%
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 848E) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.08% Terrible
Lighting 1.23
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.41 fps
MRender 2.14
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.52
1% 1.51 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.08%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB
485GB free
Firmware: CC34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 68.9
Write 62
Mixed 63.4
49% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.45
104% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 56%
MB1000EBZQB 1TB
355GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPG2 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 120
Write 98.8
Mixed 78.8
74% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.43
96% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
158GB free
Firmware: CC37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 90.7
Write 81.6
Mixed 81.7
64% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.48
106% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 68%
Seagate Portable 1TB
135GB free, PID 2300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
9.28% Terrible
Read 22.1
Write 22.9
Mixed 5.03
20% 16.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 0.31
4K Mixed 0.12
16% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.28%
Great: 17%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
11GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
4.59% Terrible
Read 21
Write 5.35
Mixed 4.54
10% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.59
4K Write 0.002
4K Mixed 0.002
6% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.59%
Great: 8%
9GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 117
Write 11.5
Mixed 19.7
42% 49.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.25
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.03
29% 2.44 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL7-7-7 DDR3-1066 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.8% Below average
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 10.6
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 10.4
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback