QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	41.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 30 '17 at 01:20
Run Duration	97 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core 191 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Memory 49.1 1-Core 40.5 2-Core 82 35% 57.2 Pts	4-Core 132 8-Core 219 21% 176 Pts	64-Core 221 14% 221 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6173) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.94 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.1% Average	Lighting 26.7 Reflection 25.1 Parallax 95.1 22% 49 fps	MRender 93.8 Gravity 93.8 Splatting 99.5 79% 95.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 88%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 413GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 1 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 26546 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 636 (B1) Unknown 96 96 45 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 1 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 57 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 528 (F1) Unknown 99 99 44769176283	50% Above average	Read 349 Write 240 Mixed 247 62% 279 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 21.2 4K Mixed 15.3 63% 19.2 MB/s	DQ Read 66.8 DQ Write 38.4 DQ Mixed 21.6 24% 42.3 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x16GB 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	48% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 24.5 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 17.7 36% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 164 24% 164 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 161%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	8x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	7x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	5x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	22x
2x16GBQEMUBench 108%, 1,370 samples	11x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16