Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4600M 7,260 User benchmarks, average bench 56% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	41.3% Average	Memory 56.7 1-Core 20.8 2-Core 37.8 28% 38.4 Pts	4-Core 141 8-Core 266 24% 204 Pts	64-Core 264 16% 264 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 66%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) 258,091 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 1909) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4268 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	2.11% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 6.04 Parallax 3.5 2% 3.87 fps	MRender 5.29 Gravity 1.23 Splatting 4.17 3% 3.56 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.11% Great: 3%
Nvidia Quadro K1100M 5,195 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 1909) 2GB CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.99 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	6.04% Terrible	Lighting 6.87 Reflection 6.08 Parallax 7.56 6% 6.84 fps	MRender 8.38 Gravity 8.03 Splatting 8.78 7% 8.4 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.04% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GB 5,922 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06H6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3812 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 756 (AA) Unknown 100 100 4576 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 93 93 248 (AE) Unknown 99 99 34 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1051 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 44 33 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0	48.5% Average	Read 487 Write 153 Mixed 329 71% 323 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 23.2 4K Mixed 14.1 55% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 73.2 DQ Write 62.2 DQ Mixed 35.4 35% 56.9 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 108%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB 3,370 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 22GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 140 Write 95.6 Mixed 111 141% 115 MB/s	4K Read 3.95 4K Write 1.44 4K Mixed 1.07 100% 2.15 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 117%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 16GB 275 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	41.3% Average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 17.1 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 6.4 24% 8.47 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2100MNvidiaBench 7%, 6,539 samples	153x
Quadro K1100MNvidiaBench 5%, 5,195 samples	117x
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	105x

SSD
MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 85%, 3,736 samples	17x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	16x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	12x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	41x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples	20x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	15x

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $150

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16