Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE (all builds)
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170322
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 27 '17 at 17:08
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	ALB-User
Background CPU	73%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Memory 91.1 1-Core 144 2-Core 284 95% 173 Pts	4-Core 507 8-Core 781 80% 644 Pts	64-Core 801 50% 801 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 92%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21 80,932 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 287GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 153 142 1316 (04) Start/Stop count 85 85 15019 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5379 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1490 (BF) G-sense error rate 66 66 34 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 56 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 187 187 39961 (C2) HDA temperature 111 93 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	53.6% Above average	Read 89.7 Write 97 Mixed 89.4 69% 92 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 2.02 4K Mixed 0.19 76% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 61%
Maxtor STM3160211AS 160GB 1,528 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 144GB free Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 85 47723254 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4806 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 334338490 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 15085 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5456 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 2805 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 54 673185832 (C2) HDA temperature 40 46 38654705704 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 72 48 31629242 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 2 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 2 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 83 236 17	42.1% Average	Read 72.7 Write 73.9 Mixed 71.3 55% 72.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.29 4K Mixed 0.42 98% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 40%
Excelstor Technology J9250S 250GB 1,876 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 148GB free (System drive) Firmware: GM2OA52A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 105 105 12897616065 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1637 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 99 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 134 134 28 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 22955 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1587 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1816 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1816 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 292058497059 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 159 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 7 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 2 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	49.6% Average	Read 86.6 Write 86 Mixed 83.2 64% 85.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.41 104% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 50%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABF050 500GB 552 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 66GB free, PID 0237 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	23% Poor	Read 63.8 Write 58.3 Mixed 39.7 67% 53.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 0.32 4K Mixed 0.19 19% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$40 98,777 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 28.3 MC Mixed 22.7 74% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 19 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 23.9 69% 24 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $241Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	997x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	94x
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples	62x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	252x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	197x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	95x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	55x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	50x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	46x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	59x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	41x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $1,154

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16